IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4213)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 29 December 2014 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5B21A8A58 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:03:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQBK9wIffFzI for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6591A88A8 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 10so11504973lbg.33 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:03:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=r1wPm8QwZelodOvKYwT+pWmby573SPiU4piRw+6yvXU=; b=K1xJzzeogt0YdcTj3kWyb52hrlwiOUNjGawOn7sLG4O8KhCPkFNbioUtXa3h/Q5HjR HnX1yJhlMZnfFVFelzZzrNiLZf1cAKjkrgB0pOHbFwMEWS7Wx16WbUmwqSaVn40b/m2X xaTg18SbgUoE76CPln2qSDmSE2jxH3yJS6gBUNWyE5TqBH693dQ3MMRwM+lX3TA5sBwG wKFpzEQiQx8dNXWa/tqWrkJFcTppMsnz29JRDxbuAuxg1s6QGG3082OvNZ8b3HgWEZZq q201poajreUaSmWV5av31dyyl+9MyhBZAWQXq9yzhNJEW0Vlq57w2sOoGPLco6JnsyIb RLhg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.22.67 with SMTP id b3mr59112909laf.82.1419876209131; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.127.168 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:03:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANO7kWCD3xbjbksL9daWXowj3ksKgp5PhngH6waz_Cvai0hhCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20141228162534.4BEE418008C@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJLRdD8qpNC0MWE+t8MXVtBnnZngNESNRv_9=xWTnFRNjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWCD3xbjbksL9daWXowj3ksKgp5PhngH6waz_Cvai0hhCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:03:29 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: lR2W7JVZQpq4-kLiFI3wpCN-jB4
Message-ID: <CALaySJJivN5Tgm3rty4k_Avm5pCcqGncfudS7-s33RBo-unA0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vcarddav/Exb4pPdeQw-MttO8BAxVOQZfMLE
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, evought@pobox.com, CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4213)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:03:33 -0000

>> This seems tobe a perfectly good conversation to have, but well out of
>> scope for "errata".  Simon, do you think otherwise?
>
> Agreed. Eric, your reasoning appears correct to me, and would be good input
> for vCard 4.1. (FYI, 4.1 is not currently being worked on, but there are
> discussions from time to time about starting such an effort...)

Is there anything here that qualifies as approved errata, where I
could edit out the rest in the errata system?  Or shall I just mark
the report as "rejected" for now, and we leave the discussion on the
mailing list?

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email