Re: [VCARDDAV] UID - why singular, not plural/ multiple?

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 26 July 2010 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3713A69E8 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eLfxGqxS0Nhp for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63BF3A6831 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banana.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:112:1e4b:d6ff:fe20:6cfe]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BE0921C40 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:18:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C4D36D0.5090406@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:18:40 +0200
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <993c954c9d05383050d996723eb3275d.squirrel@webmail.gradwell.com> <4C4C2F35.7010701@viagenie.ca> <62655a6e757b64c307b5e045746f0cfc.squirrel@webmail.gradwell.com> <4C4C43E9.3080700@viagenie.ca> <7FEEBCBA-FD05-4B7E-A269-61A5BB11AC82@iannella.it>
In-Reply-To: <7FEEBCBA-FD05-4B7E-A269-61A5BB11AC82@iannella.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] UID - why singular, not plural/ multiple?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:18:23 -0000

Renato Iannella wrote, on 07/26/2010 04:26 AM:
> Of course, we recommend UUIDs but any URI is valid, as by definition, a URI is a globally unique identifier.

Absolutely. It depends on how you interpret the URI. In the context of a UID,
it's not supposed to be dereferenced.

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org