Re: [VCARDDAV] Switch to GENDER, was Re: IETF79 vcarddav wg meeting notes

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Mon, 15 November 2010 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADC53A6D1E for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:52:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCeen4Vdmj01 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1A93A6D1C for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A561AB09735; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:52:57 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chewy.mulberrymail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HD8JJvGcmlg5; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:52:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.101.32.44]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE3E61AB0972A; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:52:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:52:52 -0500
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, vcarddav@ietf.org
Message-ID: <7E82D31941DDA196BD3F4A61@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CE18E49.4010009@viagenie.ca>
References: <4D4F4D6F1ADDF35374C0DD12@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4CE1888D.50907@viagenie.ca> <4CE18E49.4010009@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="667"
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Switch to GENDER, was Re: IETF79 vcarddav wg meeting notes
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:52:17 -0000

Hi Simon,

--On November 15, 2010 2:47:21 PM -0500 Simon Perreault 
<simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:

>> What's the difference between GENDER:undisclosed and the absence of the
>> property from the vCard?
>
> I was asking this question so that I could write the semantics of
> "undisclosed" in the draft.
>
> However, someone pointed out to me that we would not be writing the
> semantics for "male" and "female" either, since we do not want to get
> stuck in this tar pit.

That was kind of what I was going to say too.

> Therefore, I take back my question. I have absolutely no issue with
> adding "undisclosed" to the predefined values.

OK.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo