IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] Synchronization: experimental RFC?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 06 April 2010 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C84A3A67F3 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.929, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuAKKL7Hi4mQ for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 17ED73A67B4 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Apr 2010 14:03:09 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.119]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2010 16:03:09 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/q6ScWYBPqBdlQN3O1JANpYfTT67fZ8oJk2JUSdl cUeIXpQTVrLTmJ
Message-ID: <4BBB3F17.50705@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:03:03 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kepeng Li <likepeng@huawei.com>
References: <4BBB344E.1090301@viagenie.ca> <00fe01cad590$e7f68460$b7e38d20$@com>
In-Reply-To: <00fe01cad590$e7f68460$b7e38d20$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.73999999999999999
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Synchronization: experimental RFC?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:03:14 -0000

On 06.04.2010 15:56, Kepeng Li wrote:
> Hi Simon and all,
> 
> I would prefer that it stays in the current draft. If we separate it into an
> independent draft, there are some uncertainty, for example, delayed,
> disagreed etc.
> ...

That sounds like a feature, not a bug. It could mean that both parts
could progress at different speed through the approval process...

Best regards, Julian

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status