Re: [VCARDDAV] New vCard 4.0 fields

<dany.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com> Wed, 08 December 2010 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dany.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517053A6783 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:18:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_PROFILE2=1.981, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1l+w2bAW2HT3 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B1B3A6920 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:18:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 66E20798004; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:23:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFC2778001; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:23:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:19:32 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:19:31 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0088_01CB96EB.4D677D60"
Message-ID: <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214102420EEE@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4CF43BA9.7070403@stpeter.im>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [VCARDDAV] New vCard 4.0 fields
Thread-Index: AcuQJcQweR+48ZJ6RiSbMeBLVtQaVgGu+DQA
References: <mailman.4978.1289846779.4822.vcarddav@ietf.org> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB853526421410235FFFD@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4CF43BA9.7070403@stpeter.im>
From: dany.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com
To: stpeter@stpeter.im, vcarddav@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2010 14:19:32.0403 (UTC) FILETIME=[EED6F030:01CB96E2]
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] New vCard 4.0 fields
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:18:07 -0000

Some of these fields such as expertise, hobby, interest could be put in the
core specification because they are not "CAB specific" but are generic
fields.

So, are there other opinions on that ? 

Dany

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im] 
Envoyé : mardi 30 novembre 2010 00:48
À : CAUCHIE Dany RD-MAPS-LAN
Cc : vcarddav@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [VCARDDAV] New vCard 4.0 fields

On 11/26/10 6:27 AM, dany.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The OMA-CAB group defines vCard 2.1 extensions which are :
>  
> attributes      
>       X-CAB-PCC-TYPE : To specify the kind of object the vCard represents.
>       X-CAB-CONTACT-STATUS : To specify the CAB status of the object the
vCard represents (updated, temporary, subscription active, ...)
>       X-CAB-SEX : looks like SEX/GENDER
>       X-CAB-LANG : To specify the language(s) that may be used for
contacting the individual associated with the vCard.
>       X-CAB-SERVICE : To specify the aliases used on different sites by
the object that the vCard refers to.
>       X-CAB-EXPERTISE : To specify the expertise(s) of the object that the
vCard refers to.
>       X-CAB-HOBBY : To specify the hobbies of the object that the vCard
refers to.
>       X-CAB-INTEREST : To specify the interest(s) of the object that the
vCard refers to.
>       X-CAB-PUBLICNOTE : To specify additional information associated with
the object the vCard refers to.
>       X-CAB-ORG-DIRECTORY : To specify the organization-directory of the
object the vCard represents.
> 
> Parameters used in the new attributes definitions
>       X-CAB-CONTACT-ID-REF 
>       X-CAB-INDEX
>       X-CAB-LANGUAGE-PROFICIENCY-TYPE 
>       X-CAB-LANGUAGE-FLUENCY-TYPE 
>       X-CAB-LEVEL
> 
> The OMA-CAB group defines these extensions with an "IETF like"
description.
> 
> My question is : can we introduce these extensions as standard fields in
the vCard 4.0 in order to be compliant with "OMA-CAB vCard extensions" ?

These extensions are more appropriate as extensions, not as part of the core
specification of vCard 4.0.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/