IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 30 January 2012 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088FD11E808A for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:57:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eJ-3OMPnqPJQ for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6619921F85D5 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-231.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.231]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85CE140058; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:07:13 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F26E806.6080604@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:57:10 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
References: <20120130182941.6F376B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4F26E44D.6060807@viagenie.ca> <4F26E5BE.7020202@stpeter.im> <4F26E770.6090400@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4F26E770.6090400@viagenie.ca>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:57:13 -0000

On 1/30/12 11:54 AM, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2012-01-30 13:47, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> So is this "Reject" or "Hold for Document Update"?
> 
> I was hoping to discuss it further, but if you want a verdict right now
> I'd say "Reject". It's clear that there is something wrong in the RFC,
> but the proposed fix is also wrong.

I'm not in a hurry. Discussion is good!

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status