IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)

Peter Sheerin <Peter@PetesGuide.com> Mon, 06 February 2012 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Peter@PetesGuide.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ACA21F871C for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:39:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1eskOeQVgan for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286C721F871A for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE63425C061 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:39:32 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=PetesGuide.com; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=petesguide.com ; b=AcHKtolgCJ/3OZNZW5sPfR+/8bjwL8/h64RIumzU4UGk91JfAelcpMGWjH/B O68zqS7Bv9RXgIQCwBrhTi6uoiIeMb/zaqrQTsCJvupj1vIJss9OjeAu5bDjFRD7 ONzPIHNza2w6gQWlYoHJzrBcGorr2Anrucq4Fe4/ZpLb+N4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=PetesGuide.com; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= petesguide.com; bh=eFJh5JSgq2hSVc1TwkGNMdnPHXc=; b=Waxy/M5BX67vb lVCD/0B3vfgP2xf2GzLN3brfIQayu81nZNMG3fkYAj1lGUCaVj9UJnF6rdtlyGZf tLpWomkRmiodVrqcEAKgYQPlAiZNHZP/yqRBPk8dEJAFoNebyh2l8ZlE4mMryz3V L+eb7h/fDW3bMhTZzZGb+lB2bd8iPs=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [64.134.224.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: Peter@PetesGuide.com) by homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA0DA25C063 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:39:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F301E46.2060903@PetesGuide.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:39:02 -0800
From: Peter Sheerin <Peter@PetesGuide.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0a2) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/11.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <20120130182941.6F376B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4F26E44D.6060807@viagenie.ca> <14E42CB21F0E477CA6DA0AC8E1E1A40D@Javier2> <4F2C0224.5080701@viagenie.ca> <23AAF311845C458FB4606A66F77369DC@Javier2> <4F2FD688.4020602@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4F2FD688.4020602@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120206-0, 02/06/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:39:33 -0000

Can you explain this a bit more?

Is there a fear that doing it right will impact existing 4.0 
implementations, or is the concern something else?

On 2012-02-06 05:32, Simon Perreault wrote:
> OK, we're on the same wavelength now. I suggest modifying the errata 
> because the example is wrong. There's no way to make it right while 
> keeping an ABNF that is consistent across parameters (so that it is 
> possible to write a generic vCard parser).

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status