[VCARDDAV] The LOGO property
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 02 November 2010 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9328C3A69F7 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UXarBKambTAZ for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977DF3A69D3 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:9da2:a7fe:1c63:4205]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4AC720DFE; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:54:21 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4CD0504D.8030106@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:54:21 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: [VCARDDAV] The LOGO property
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:54:18 -0000
> 6.6.3. LOGO > > In practice this property has caused confusion with respect to the > PHOTO property. Which should you use when? > > Also, why is this included in the Organizational Properties section > rather than alongside PHOTO? > > If there is a more specific semantic to be applied, e.g. this is the > LOGO for the organization that the person the vCard object represents > works for, then that specific semantic should be explicitly > mentioned. > > Recommend also providing an example with both LOGO and PHOTO that > clearly demonstrates the proper/intended use of each. Could you please make an explicit proposal? I don't exactly know what to change, and how to change it, and we're much too late in the process for me to take the liberty of making possibly important changes. Thanks, Simon -- NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
- [VCARDDAV] The LOGO property Simon Perreault