Re: [VCARDDAV] Comments on vCard XML Schema
Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au> Tue, 09 March 2010 06:18 UTC
Return-Path: <renato@nicta.com.au>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568EE3A6884 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:18:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RELAY_IS_221=2.222]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9pZH74wiA+J for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ajax.nicta.com.au (ajax.nicta.com.au [221.199.217.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697B13A6868 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:18:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atp-mbx1.it.nicta.com.au ([221.199.216.123] helo=atp-mbx1.in.nicta.com.au) by ajax.nicta.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <renato@nicta.com.au>) id 1NosjZ-0005OG-T8 for vcarddav@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:16:01 +1100
Received: from cb8fa4d6.qrl.nicta.com.au (221.199.216.124) by atp-mbx1.in.nicta.com.au (221.199.216.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.393.1; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:16:01 +1100
References: <CD4CC43F-65E0-4A5E-8CAD-42A692B83F3A@nicta.com.au> <4B916C14.3040307@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4B916C14.3040307@viagenie.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <B19B3D19-4BA4-484B-8CE7-3BEE0D591A0E@nicta.com.au>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:16:00 +1000
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4125-6.000.1038-17238.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.860300-0.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 221.199.216.123
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: renato@nicta.com.au
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on ajax.nicta.com.au); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Comments on vCard XML Schema
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:18:25 -0000
On 6 Mar 2010, at 06:39, Simon Perreault wrote: > Yes, but the type parameter takes a list of values. We could do: > > <tel type="work,cell">... > > But it's harder to grep/manipulate/parse/validate than separate elements. Well... is it? There is great debate on Elements V Attributes from a design/performance point-of-view [1] I like [2] as it gives good reasons why Attributes make more sense in this case, and pointing out that "Sensible schema languages, meaning RELAX NG, treat elements and attributes symmetrically". Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA [1] http://www.google.com.au/search?&q=xml+elements+versus+attributes [2] http://recycledknowledge.blogspot.com/2008/03/elements-or-attributes.html
- [VCARDDAV] Comments on vCard XML Schema Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Comments on vCard XML Schema Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Comments on vCard XML Schema Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Comments on vCard XML Schema Julian Reschke