IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Fri, 09 July 2010 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C3E3A69E3 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.321
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.279, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJKSeAMKrjPA for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27CF3A6AAF for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:b5fc:5c3:346a:9a09]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C852621520; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:29:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C375BDF.7080805@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:26:55 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@hotmail.com>
References: <AANLkTiniY60njEGixPGeKvs_m1LE_uVrvtnDQuXrP7jV@mail.gmail.com><4C20B501.6030802@viagenie.ca><8822D300A5ED445A8CB9C6BB9B60A4E7@Javier2> <4C214045.4050703@viagenie.ca> <BLU0-SMTP41B4D29208563A44A42040ADC50@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP41B4D29208563A44A42040ADC50@phx.gbl>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:29:43 -0000

On 2010-06-23 01:05, Javier Godoy wrote:
> About case sensitiviy for "T" and "Z", they are defined in section 3.4.3
> "Characters used as designators" of ISO 8601:2004 as: «
> In representations the following characters are used as designators:
>   [Z] is used as UTC designator.
>   [T] is used as time designator
> »
> 
> It seems they are specified as uppercase (at least, there is no example
> with
> lowercase designators), so in this case we should the ABNF.
> 
> utc-designator = "Z"
> zone   = utc-designator / utc-offset
> 
> time-designator = "T"
> date-time = date-noreduc  time-designator time-notrunc
> timestamp = date-complete time-designator time-complete
> date-and-or-time = date-time / date / time-designator time

I'm processing this now, and I realize that I don't understand exactly
what you're suggesting. What's the difference with the existing ABNF
except that you've factored out the "Z" and "T" strings?

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email