Re: [VCARDDAV] Issue in vcardrev-11 with LANGUAGE examples?

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 31 May 2010 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B942F3A6803 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WOSEzJ7mlx3J for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6273A6A37 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000::67]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 926AC20DC3 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 May 2010 16:01:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C04159D.7060200@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 16:01:33 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <4C01AA53.7060101@atlantika-arts.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C01AA53.7060101@atlantika-arts.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Issue in vcardrev-11 with LANGUAGE examples?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:01:46 -0000

On 2010-05-29 19:59, Markus Lorenz wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm a bit confused about the first illegal example in section "5.1.
> LANGUAGE".
>
> The description says:
>
>     Properties with different LANGUAGE parameters that represent the same
>     data count as 1 toward cardinality and MUST have the same PID value
>     if the PID parameter is used.  This is because there is logically a
>     single property which is expressed in multiple languages.
>
> The legal examples is the following:
>
>       BIRTH;LANGUAGE=fr:Ville de Quebec
>       BIRTH;LANGUAGE=en:Quebec City
>
> These LANGUAGE parameters represent the same data. Therefore they count
> as 1 towards cardinality. If the PID is used it MUST have the same value
> for both parameters, because they represent the same data. Inserting a
> PID with value 1 to the legal example leads to this:
>
>       BIRTH;PID=1;LANGUAGE=fr:Ville de Quebec
>       BIRTH;PID=1;LANGUAGE=en:Quebec City
>
> This is similar to the first _illegal_ example!

Yes I'm confused as well. I can't find traces of how I got it this way. 
I think you're right. I'll change the example so that the two cases 
above are legal.

Thanks,
Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org