IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] vcardrev nits

"Javier Godoy" <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar> Wed, 16 September 2009 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7C628C0EC for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.324
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.324 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.322, BAYES_50=0.001, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJqSO6RkoIXU for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fich.unl.edu.ar (fich.unl.edu.ar [168.96.132.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4427528C0D6 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Javier2 ([201.231.15.116]) (authenticated user rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar) by fich.unl.edu.ar (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits)); Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:56:22 -0300
Message-ID: <6CFB403EC15B4D41AF136E1F1BA29B8E@Javier2>
From: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <4AB00791.4040005@stpeter.im> <4A6CDE38802D481BAF82CDF30E08B75E@Javier2> <4AB095A2.2090407@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:55:07 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] vcardrev nits
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:01:41 -0000

Julian Reschke wrote:

> Javier Godoy wrote:
>> ...
>>> Would a reference to RFC 4770 be appropriate?
>>
>> I don't think so, RFC 4770 will be obsoleted by vcardrev.
>> ...
>
> If it's mentioned as obsoleted then it should also have an informative 
> reference.
>

I think the question was whether RFC 4770 should be explicitly referenced in 
section 7.4.3. IMPP of vcardrev (which is based on RFC 4770).

BTW, the references to RFC 2425, RFC 2426 and RFC 4770 (all of them will be 
obsoleted by vcardrev) are normative in draft version 08.

Best Regards

Javier

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email