Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4213)
Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Mon, 29 December 2014 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152451A6FFF for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:02:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJRPmZDGz0pO for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:01:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (mail-la0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CF631A6FF7 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id q1so11423851lam.19 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:01:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Mr8Z2Iq6RwUH4S+kjNnQw3alhyVOnVxlNi2YXox2F4c=; b=F0xv9x5aYyvw7EDUUOymvmFujPpH9NKkW5ugRt3IWjRtct50Bfzxn0Re+7hSkJuxIy 3CJi/2UZD1mZ8lRftzfCiQiYjfCxrprlv4YAJTuKdfCtDBuaCjtzm/FS3XINPzq9Ed3F Ksgkz5QguEBGj1nv1g/+F2JRQ9MPwbIMPyypQHxnWX7PqEpLFGVFKZH5onnHC++J5qhr ajnR8NfH4ETaw9+6puUc781VC6YU2gEualmTRenkw6C21jSu46kCH7cOwPchnbVNmvJy v4GlaS5BTFDq0Nm1RYYVB+nhdsBZEu0ISIAlU9YjFSYw2hersvyVi0EgOJVOnCXLGS9R WoZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkTn5bMxbpbN9IZPPD6heIUb1G1Hz04kE9zvfigUzaxQXlxqm4h3Dyt+TlwdN0NfkdIhZKu
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.168.164 with SMTP id zx4mr57322560lbb.28.1419865312558; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:01:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.84.145 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:01:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLRdD8qpNC0MWE+t8MXVtBnnZngNESNRv_9=xWTnFRNjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20141228162534.4BEE418008C@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJLRdD8qpNC0MWE+t8MXVtBnnZngNESNRv_9=xWTnFRNjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:01:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CANO7kWCD3xbjbksL9daWXowj3ksKgp5PhngH6waz_Cvai0hhCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c23564959dae050b5c2781"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vcarddav/dGEJCqBGaykM2bjcKRkxcwnN5OY
Cc: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, evought@pobox.com, CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4213)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:02:03 -0000
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > > This seems tobe a perfectly good conversation to have, but well out of > scope for "errata". Simon, do you think otherwise? > Agreed. Eric, your reasoning appears correct to me, and would be good input for vCard 4.1. (FYI, 4.1 is not currently being worked on, but there are discussions from time to time about starting such an effort...) Simon
- [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4… RFC Errata System
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Barry Leiba
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Barry Leiba
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Barry Leiba
- [VCARDDAV] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6… RFC Errata System