Re: [VCARDDAV] Comment on vcardrev-11 DATE
"Javier Godoy" <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar> Tue, 01 June 2010 22:36 UTC
Return-Path: <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0185C3A6908 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUHFEX7mAfk4 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fich.unl.edu.ar (fich.unl.edu.ar [168.96.132.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945B23A6943 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Javier2 ([190.193.124.162]) (authenticated user rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar) by fich.unl.edu.ar (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits)); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:34:07 -0300
Message-ID: <A92D8824B07C4FB385C17801E852E1A5@Javier2>
From: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <4C01B272.4000401@atlantika-arts.net> <4C04172F.5020507@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:17:46 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Comment on vcardrev-11 DATE
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:36:09 -0000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Perreault" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> To: <vcarddav@ietf.org> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Comment on vcardrev-11 DATE > On 2010-05-29 20:33, Markus Lorenz wrote: >> But I was confused about the second example. I didn't understand why >> there was a dash between year and month, because in all other cases the >> year is immediately followed by the month. From my rule it should have >> been "198504-" or "198504". >> >> Finally the English Wikipedia article >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601) told me the reason for this. The >> format YYYYMM could be misinterpreted by YYMMDD which was allowed in ISO >> 8601-2000. >> >>> From my point of view mentioning this in the specification could be >> reasonable to avoid confusion for developers who don't have access to >> the ISO standard. > > Agreed. There will be an explanatory note in the next revision. As part of the clarification, it should be noted that 1985-04-12 is illegal. Section 4.3 already states that: "only the basic format is supported", but from the example date 1985-04 (which is basic format, as Markus explained) one could incorrectly assume that yyyy-mm-dd is also allowed. Best Regards Javier
- [VCARDDAV] Comment on vcardrev-11 DATE Markus Lorenz
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Comment on vcardrev-11 DATE Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Comment on vcardrev-11 DATE Javier Godoy