IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 23 June 2010 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A493A6868 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.734, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKnuwrfCJICW for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E93B3A6AAE for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2010 16:43:39 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.101]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp058) with SMTP; 23 Jun 2010 18:43:39 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/r2bscFk3rTWgMKQ4Rsi7pmu0Wopztb/9EsjTNa+ Hr5ppy0tSwWrOx
Message-ID: <4C2239B5.80708@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:43:33 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
References: <AANLkTiniY60njEGixPGeKvs_m1LE_uVrvtnDQuXrP7jV@mail.gmail.com> <4C20B501.6030802@viagenie.ca> <8822D300A5ED445A8CB9C6BB9B60A4E7@Javier2> <4C214045.4050703@viagenie.ca> <4C22307A.5080005@gmx.de> <1B9090FC2E881251F5D37374@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <1B9090FC2E881251F5D37374@caldav.corp.apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:43:34 -0000

On 23.06.2010 18:37, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> --On June 23, 2010 6:04:10 PM +0200 Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>>> 1. Leave the ABNF as is but state that the value is case insensitive.
>>> 2. Change the ABNF and state that the value is case sensitive.
>>>
>>> I think I would prefer 1.
>>> ...
>>
>> You can also say:
>>
>> BEGIN-value = %d86.67.65.82.68; uppercase "VCARD"
>>
>> if you are concerned about verbosity...
>
> I think we should just allow any case for "VCARD". Otherwise, if we are
> concerned with case-sensitivity of this "property", then we would need
> to look at all the other similar ones - ones with an "enumerated" value
> like KIND. Would we have to define those case-sensitively in the ABNF too?

I have no opinion whether they should allow case-insensitive matching; 
that's something for you, the subject matter experts...

Best regards, Julian

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email