IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 06 February 2012 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0F521F85C5 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 05:33:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.368
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TPdcbZ2oZIsX for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 05:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617E821F863C for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 05:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:5925:d1f0:396b:1b66]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87F3520D1D; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:32:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4F2FD688.4020602@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:32:56 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
References: <20120130182941.6F376B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4F26E44D.6060807@viagenie.ca> <14E42CB21F0E477CA6DA0AC8E1E1A40D@Javier2> <4F2C0224.5080701@viagenie.ca> <23AAF311845C458FB4606A66F77369DC@Javier2>
In-Reply-To: <23AAF311845C458FB4606A66F77369DC@Javier2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, vcarddav@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:33:02 -0000

On 2012-02-04 18:08, Javier Godoy wrote:
> Depending on the resolution, the errata might have to be modified (is
> that possible?), because I suggested fixing the ABNF, and only mentioned
> (in the "Notes" part) the alternative of fixing the examples and leaving
> the ABNF intact.

OK, we're on the same wavelength now. I suggest modifying the errata 
because the example is wrong. There's no way to make it right while 
keeping an ABNF that is consistent across parameters (so that it is 
possible to write a generic vCard parser).

To modify the errata, just file a new one, the AD will do the rest. ;)

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status