Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)

"Javier Godoy" <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar> Sat, 10 July 2010 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E993A697B for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 19:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.184
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKkeme42xuLi for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 19:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fich.unl.edu.ar (fich.unl.edu.ar [168.96.132.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328BE3A695D for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 19:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Javier2 ([190.193.109.175]) (authenticated user rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar) by fich.unl.edu.ar (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits)); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:28:35 -0300
Message-ID: <F8C607871D13409C971EB4E78ABEF4C8@Javier2>
From: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
References: <AANLkTiniY60njEGixPGeKvs_m1LE_uVrvtnDQuXrP7jV@mail.gmail.com><4C20B501.6030802@viagenie.ca><8822D300A5ED445A8CB9C6BB9B60A4E7@Javier2> <4C214045.4050703@viagenie.ca> <BLU0-SMTP41B4D29208563A44A42040ADC50@phx.gbl> <4C375BDF.7080805@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:28:17 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 02:28:26 -0000

Simon Perreault wrote,

> On 2010-06-23 01:05, Javier Godoy wrote:
>> About case sensitiviy for "T" and "Z", they are defined in section 3.4.3
>> "Characters used as designators" of ISO 8601:2004 as: «
>> In representations the following characters are used as designators:
>>   [Z] is used as UTC designator.
>>   [T] is used as time designator
>> »
>>
>> It seems they are specified as uppercase (at least, there is no example
>> with
>> lowercase designators), so in this case we should the ABNF.
>>
>> utc-designator = "Z"
>> zone   = utc-designator / utc-offset
>>
>> time-designator = "T"
>> date-time = date-noreduc  time-designator time-notrunc
>> timestamp = date-complete time-designator time-complete
>> date-and-or-time = date-time / date / time-designator time
>
> I'm processing this now, and I realize that I don't understand exactly
> what you're suggesting. What's the difference with the existing ABNF
> except that you've factored out the "Z" and "T" strings?
>
> Simon

Sorry, my mistake. It should be:
  utc-designator  = %d90; uppercase "Z"
  time-designator = %d84; uppercase "T"
  date-time = date-noreduc  time-designator time-notrunc


Best Regards

Javier