IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Wed, 23 June 2010 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2973A6AAC for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.931, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1VGrcuzb-Iz for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913EC3A6AAE for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DE417C59958; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:37:38 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chewy.mulberrymail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6aZDT0+ku3u; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:37:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.101.32.44]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C61A17C5994D; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:37:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:37:28 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Message-ID: <1B9090FC2E881251F5D37374@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C22307A.5080005@gmx.de>
References: <AANLkTiniY60njEGixPGeKvs_m1LE_uVrvtnDQuXrP7jV@mail.gmail.com> <4C20B501.6030802@viagenie.ca> <8822D300A5ED445A8CB9C6BB9B60A4E7@Javier2> <4C214045.4050703@viagenie.ca> <4C22307A.5080005@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="708"
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:37:32 -0000

Hi Julian,

--On June 23, 2010 6:04:10 PM +0200 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 
wrote:

>> 1. Leave the ABNF as is but state that the value is case insensitive.
>> 2. Change the ABNF and state that the value is case sensitive.
>>
>> I think I would prefer 1.
>> ...
>
> You can also say:
>
>    BEGIN-value = %d86.67.65.82.68; uppercase "VCARD"
>
> if you are concerned about verbosity...

I think we should just allow any case for "VCARD". Otherwise, if we are 
concerned with case-sensitivity of this "property", then we would need to 
look at all the other similar ones - ones with an "enumerated" value like 
KIND. Would we have to define those case-sensitively in the ABNF too?

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email