Re: [VCARDDAV] RFC 6715

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Fri, 07 September 2012 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377BE21F8699 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7IQWLVunTkT for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C24121F8697 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:183e:b0be:9214:97a9]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22C9740167 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:25:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <504A1202.8080908@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:25:54 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <CAJNb_g0QsaWYV=sty=-mFLTOpr7q+JMqFjKEDU3rD3WTdamNzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCPQzSVKMR6r-c71gmviZdtkXJdJrv2Uhb5V1wBSkinkg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCPQzSVKMR6r-c71gmviZdtkXJdJrv2Uhb5V1wBSkinkg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] RFC 6715
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:25:56 -0000

Le 2012-09-06 22:24, Barry Leiba a écrit :
>> Also, the specs do not state how a list of properties should be sorted if
>> some of them have INDEX parameters and others do not.  I would think that
>> they should follow the same rules as the PREF parameter, which is:
>> properties WITHOUT the parameter are pushed to the end of the sorted list.
>> For example, the properties below are presented in sorted order:
>>
>> INTEREST;INDEX=1:hockey
>> INTEREST;INDEX=2:baseball
>> INTEREST:music
>
> This is also correct

I don't understand. In vCard, property order is irrelevant. PREF does 
not influence property order. I would advise against publishing this in 
an errata.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca