IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] IDN in EMAIL

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 05 November 2010 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D7F3A691E for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AeRGkgOkcKIw for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DBA3A6912 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwEAO/y00yQ/khMgWdsb2JhbACDKZ5BFQEBFiIioQGKLpEKgSKDM3MEilY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,304,1286150400"; d="scan'208";a="68474586"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2010 19:10:26 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-98-66.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-98-66.cisco.com [10.61.98.66]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA5JAPsa006898; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:10:25 GMT
Message-ID: <4CD456B9.2050808@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:10:49 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
References: <4CD03940.3010609@one.com> <4CD0403F.4000904@viagenie.ca> <329CCDCFDBB01AAE1B6331EF@socrates.local> <4CD40B29.3040601@viagenie.ca> <DD7EE2813E5A75E9B60A0680@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <DD7EE2813E5A75E9B60A0680@caldav.corp.apple.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] IDN in EMAIL
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:10:14 -0000

There are a number of drafts on EAI's plate to get them to PS.

On 11/5/10 2:56 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> --On November 5, 2010 9:48:25 AM -0400 Simon Perreault
> <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>
>>> I think my preference is to say that utf-8 email address components are
>>> allowed. Client will need to properly encode those when used
>>> over-the-wire. However, putting IDN encoded email addresses in too
>>> should be just fine. So I say prefer utf-8, but idn/eai encoded is OK.
>>
>> So are you saying we should go back to a free-form text value?
>>
>> Is there an equivalent of addr-spec somewhere that allows UTF-8?
>
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5335> Section 4.4. That is
> experimental, which is why I suggest we ask EAI folks about this and
> see whether they think it is reasonable for us to adopt.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email