Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 30 January 2012 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D907C21F8495 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:47:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5L6ZJn8-7nm3 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A3521F8493 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-231.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.231]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C08E40058; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:57:29 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F26E5BE.7020202@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:47:26 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
References: <20120130182941.6F376B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4F26E44D.6060807@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4F26E44D.6060807@viagenie.ca>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:47:29 -0000

On 1/30/12 11:41 AM, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2012-01-30 13:29, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> type-param = "TYPE=" type-value *("," type-value)
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> type-param =  "TYPE=" type-value *("," type-value)
>> type-param =/ "TYPE=" DQUOTE type-value *("," type-value) DQUOTE
> 
> Well, all parameters can be implicitly quoted. So why restrict yourself
> to the TYPE parameter?
> 
> If the ABNF is to be fixed, it would need to be done implicitly for all
> parameters at once.
> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Section 6.4.1 states that TYPE parameter values can be specified
>> as a parameter list (e.g., TYPE=text;TYPE=voice) or as a value list
>> (e.g.,
>> TYPE="text,voice").
>>
>> Either the description is right (and the ABNF should be corrected), or
>> the ABNF is right, and the description and examples in Sections 6.4.1
>> and 8 should be fixed.
> 
> The examples use quotes for parameters that don't absolutely need them.
> I think this is fine. The ABNF should allow it.
> 
>> Value lists in vCard 3.0 did not use quotes (e.g "TYPE=dom,postal" in
>> Section 3.3.1 of RFC 2426). If the ABNF is fixed this would be a
>> significant change from  RFC 2426 syntax.
> 
> Parameters with commas don't need to be quoted. So the examples are
> using superfluous quotes. Not a problem per se.

So is this "Reject" or "Hold for Document Update"?

http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/errata-processing.html

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/