[VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4261)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 05 February 2015 09:42 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B280F1A01A5 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 01:42:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_36=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1p-LQYRr7OpL for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 01:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE711A019B for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 01:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 123D81832B6; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 01:42:01 -0800 (PST)
To: simon.perreault@viagenie.ca, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150205094201.123D81832B6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 01:42:01 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vcarddav/iggo0nRkIzkOmeDSpGDdQwf7hk0>
Cc: ivan.enderlin@fruux.com, vcarddav@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4261)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:42:21 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6350, "vCard Format Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6350&eid=4261 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Ivan Enderlin <ivan.enderlin@fruux.com> Section: 4.3 Original Text ------------- In RFC6351 (Appendice A), we have a Relax NG Schema defining date and time format: # 4.3.1 value-date = element date { xsd:string { pattern = "\d{8}|\d{4}-\d\d|--\d\d(\d\d)?|---\d\d" } } # 4.3.2 value-time = element time { xsd:string { pattern = "(\d\d(\d\d(\d\d)?)?|-\d\d(\d\d?)|--\d\d)" ~ "(Z|[+\-]\d\d(\d\d)?)?" } } # 4.3.3 value-date-time = element date-time { xsd:string { pattern = "(\d{8}|--\d{4}|---\d\d)T\d\d(\d\d(\d\d)?)?" ~ "(Z|[+\-]\d\d(\d\d)?)?" } } # 4.3.4 value-date-and-or-time = value-date | value-date-time | value-time We assume this is the format from ISO.8601.2004 mentioned in RFC6350. There is no link on ISO.8601.2004 because ISO documents are not free. So this is our guess: These formats are very close based on different examples in RFC6350 and RFC6351. Corrected Text -------------- See notes. Notes ----- Question: --10 is October or 10 seconds? --10 can fit into value-date and value-time: * From value-date, the 3rd element in the disjunction is --\d\d(\d\d)?, so it matches --10, * From value-time, the last element in the first disjunction is --\d\d, so it matches --10. value-date-and-or-time matches value-date before value-time. Conclusion: --10 is always October and never 10 seconds. Is it a technical error in the RFC. PS: This erratum can be applied on RFC6350 and RFC6351. PPS: Consider the following erratum http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6351&eid=4247 on value-time also. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6350 (draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-22) -------------------------------------- Title : vCard Format Specification Publication Date : August 2011 Author(s) : S. Perreault Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : vCard and CardDAV Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4… RFC Errata System
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Barry Leiba
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- [VCARDDAV] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6… RFC Errata System