IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4213)

Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Mon, 29 December 2014 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC04F1A8F37 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:38:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nBSa29rpkfo7 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:38:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF80C1A8BB4 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hs14so11649702lab.39 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:38:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QU8wTT/e8tZMi/zyHIZVIzWTqlsWIAidRuFM0K1tZzE=; b=IDsaLHlK5e3KecWkHp5qcfWDTFdDSPcPHOWy7Z/KGu6Tl9CJCug7Bja8uX5R3JvbUd L1MGFhGQN4D1X8k0h7xb7BcvjgXFtUtVsTLhDAKOghKi4bT0mwaE7qBO1mwmBbAOOrRL 873gL1KKusABBn2RO3Y5FM43hqUV7RnDgp9sfS1UwGxNJW4rHFtivcZrC+q1BU7veLcu qeZeWCd5Edf3sw8DVTewym/zPOzaY6TU9qB/U0jzz1ziHSGsTDE5jBh4XLXJppbknMfK T8iB/SyNRP7uelTFqQ21/XIkHmYaSSc/EWC6qT3RE5chqkIRW0rV1/SESlZf3PmXVcWY 3U7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlvAG+vFAMBDtmXbD5Q804O0/mQeXvEhAop0R/sQU3DwJBRAyOuTyhE7XHuvbUI4hD6jOKZ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.188.201 with SMTP id gc9mr21765505lbc.6.1419885500082; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.84.145 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:38:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJivN5Tgm3rty4k_Avm5pCcqGncfudS7-s33RBo-unA0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20141228162534.4BEE418008C@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJLRdD8qpNC0MWE+t8MXVtBnnZngNESNRv_9=xWTnFRNjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANO7kWCD3xbjbksL9daWXowj3ksKgp5PhngH6waz_Cvai0hhCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJivN5Tgm3rty4k_Avm5pCcqGncfudS7-s33RBo-unA0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:38:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CANO7kWBYXWkQSYzyujpSdVuBroa5kRzoH0HyGhG+4cJFHrevbA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c37366dc07ef050b60da73"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vcarddav/k0hAs4RlopsR1ejZugPqFTixBZ4
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, evought@pobox.com, CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4213)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:38:23 -0000

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
wrote:
>
> Is there anything here that qualifies as approved errata, where I
> could edit out the rest in the errata system?  Or shall I just mark
> the report as "rejected" for now, and we leave the discussion on the
> mailing list?
>

I think should can mark it "rejected".

Thanks,
Simon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email