Re: [VCARDDAV] RFC 6715

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Fri, 07 September 2012 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06A121F86E8 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_83=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DvNcq7Za8Wq5 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2D721F86E5 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:183e:b0be:9214:97a9]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09D8740167; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:02:47 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <504A1AA6.9070909@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:02:46 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Angstadt <mike.angstadt@gmail.com>
References: <CAJNb_g0QsaWYV=sty=-mFLTOpr7q+JMqFjKEDU3rD3WTdamNzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCPQzSVKMR6r-c71gmviZdtkXJdJrv2Uhb5V1wBSkinkg@mail.gmail.com> <504A1202.8080908@viagenie.ca> <CAJNb_g1+Zw7WtWvR-QqVUp8VHOaZ0QjAoh1dLig6+3oqi9ZCuw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJNb_g1+Zw7WtWvR-QqVUp8VHOaZ0QjAoh1dLig6+3oqi9ZCuw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] RFC 6715
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:02:50 -0000

Le 2012-09-07 11:57, Michael Angstadt a écrit :
> For example, the ordering of the following properties is very clear,
> since they all have INDEX parameters:
>
> INTEREST;INDEX=3:art
> INTEREST;INDEX=2:baseball
> INTEREST;INDEX=4:music
> INTEREST;INDEX=1:hockey
>
> However, if some properties have INDEX parameters and others don't, the
> spec doesn't spell how how they should be ordered (unless I missed
> something).
>
> INTEREST:art
> INTEREST;INDEX=2:baseball
> INTEREST:music
> INTEREST;INDEX=1:hockey

I think I understand. You're not talking about property ordering in the 
vCard file. You're talking about something at a higher level: ordering 
interest values based on the contents of the vCard file. Right?

If so, this makes total sense, so please continue and sorry for the 
interruption. :)

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca