IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] Last call on vCard extensions from OMA CAB

Likepeng <likepeng@huawei.com> Fri, 06 April 2012 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <likepeng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C1321F8555 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.943
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.943 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCu5RtjgU--S for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F31221F8533 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AER87582; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 03:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:56:06 -0700
Received: from SZXEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.160) by dfweml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:56:04 -0700
Received: from SZXEML525-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.158]) by szxeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.160]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:56:01 +0800
From: Likepeng <likepeng@huawei.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Thread-Topic: [VCARDDAV] Last call on vCard extensions from OMA CAB
Thread-Index: AQHNE2mw8glyDWJJ1U6bFpoe052CFpaNY1+w
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:56:00 +0000
Message-ID: <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F203321828@szxeml525-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <4F54C1B8.2000606@viagenie.ca> <4F7DFEB7.3060201@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4F7DFEB7.3060201@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.70.109.53]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "vcarddav@ietf.org" <vcarddav@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Last call on vCard extensions from OMA CAB
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:57:04 -0000

Thanks Peter for the review.

I also reviewed the spec again, and find an editorial issue:

In Abstract and Introduction section: we need to add reference to OMA Data Synchronization, 
here is the reference we can add in the reference section:

   [OMA-DS]  Open Mobile Alliance, "Data Synchronization Protocol", March 2009, <http://www.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/docs/copyrightclick.aspx?pck=DS&file=V1_2_2-20090319-A/OMA-TS-DS_Protocol-V1_2_2-20090319-A.pdf>.

Kind Regards
Kepeng
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: vcarddav-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vcarddav-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Peter Saint-Andre
发送时间: 2012年4月6日 4:21
收件人: Simon Perreault
抄送: vcarddav@ietf.org
主题: Re: [VCARDDAV] Last call on vCard extensions from OMA CAB

On 3/5/12 6:38 AM, Simon Perreault wrote:

> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on this draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-vcarddav-oma-cab-extensions/

Sorry about the late feedback -- things got kind of busy there before
and during IETF 83. :)

Some time ago I reviewed an earlier version of this document. The
revised I-D is much more readable and well-focused, so kudos to the
authors! I have only a few small comments...

Abstract and Introduction: "important" contact fields -- they are
important to CAB but not *necessarily* to anyone else (although they
seem generally useful to me). I'd remove this word.

Section 1.1: s/search paradigm/search function/

The LEVEL parameter has possible (do you mean "allowable" or "defined"?)
values of "beginner", "average", and "expert" when used with EXPERTISE
and "high", "medium", and "low" when used with HOBBY or INTEREST. Why
not just use "high", "medium", and "low" for all three? IMHO an
EXPERTISE of "low" is the same as an EXPERTISE of "beginner" (etc.) so I
see no reason for different lexical representations of what is the same
basic concept.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


_______________________________________________
VCARDDAV mailing list
VCARDDAV@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status