Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND in draft 15

When you say the KIND/MEMBER is definitive, does that imply the CATEGORIES
may be inconsistent?

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> --On December 20, 2010 5:54:54 PM -0800 Helge Hess <
> helge.hess@opengroupware.org> wrote:
>
>  In the case of Apple AB the groups ARE represented as vCard objects.
>>>> (and also added to CATEGORIES as a secondary).
>>>>
>>> This is false
>>>
>>
>> Take a look at the title of this mailing list [VCARDDAV], then try again.
>>
>
> Let me clarify in detail: AddressBook's CardDAV support does represent
> groups as vCards on the server. When we were working on this implementation
> we were hoping that vCard v4 would be done so we could leverage that (the
> KIND property). However, we had to stick with vCard v3, but we basically
> followed the v4 model by having an X-ADDRESSBOOKSERVER-KIND property for the
> KIND, and X-ADDRESSBOOKSERVER-MEMBER properties for the membership list. We
> also use the CATEGORIES on the individual vCard records to show which groups
> they belong to (though the group vCard membership list is definitive).
>
> So as far as I am concerned KIND is important.
>
> --
> Cyrus Daboo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VCARDDAV mailing list
> VCARDDAV@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav
>