Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 30 January 2012 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF0311E8087 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:41:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GqUDXTBPK0bn for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:41:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D3D11E8081 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:80f9:39e9:9453:692c]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F078A21F45; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:41:17 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4F26E44D.6060807@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:41:17 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20120130182941.6F376B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120130182941.6F376B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:41:21 -0000
On 2012-01-30 13:29, RFC Errata System wrote: > Original Text > ------------- > type-param = "TYPE=" type-value *("," type-value) > > Corrected Text > -------------- > type-param = "TYPE=" type-value *("," type-value) > type-param =/ "TYPE=" DQUOTE type-value *("," type-value) DQUOTE Well, all parameters can be implicitly quoted. So why restrict yourself to the TYPE parameter? If the ABNF is to be fixed, it would need to be done implicitly for all parameters at once. > Notes > ----- > Section 6.4.1 states that TYPE parameter values can be specified > as a parameter list (e.g., TYPE=text;TYPE=voice) or as a value list (e.g., > TYPE="text,voice"). > > Either the description is right (and the ABNF should be corrected), or the ABNF is right, and the description and examples in Sections 6.4.1 and 8 should be fixed. The examples use quotes for parameters that don't absolutely need them. I think this is fine. The ABNF should allow it. > Value lists in vCard 3.0 did not use quotes (e.g "TYPE=dom,postal" in Section 3.3.1 of RFC 2426). If the ABNF is fixed this would be a significant change from RFC 2426 syntax. Parameters with commas don't need to be quoted. So the examples are using superfluous quotes. Not a problem per se. Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
- [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3… RFC Errata System
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Javier Godoy
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Javier Godoy
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Peter Sheerin
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Barry Leiba
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Javier Godoy
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Peter Saint-Andre