Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (6812)

"Emily Love Mills (she/her)" <emily@emlove.me> Thu, 06 January 2022 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <emily@emlove.me>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DC93A1664 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 12:57:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=emlove.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iFnO4ojDMHE2 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 12:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch (mail-4018.proton.ch [185.70.40.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7DFC3A1662 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 12:57:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 20:57:07 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emlove.me; s=protonmail; t=1641502630; bh=+x4spNTZ59WrkA0TaRsN9lX0T5AW2V74MPXml73eLj0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc; b=ADi8lSoH8dNVPi7R/f6eO3priDARKnVSTLnvH6IC0QSyguYw8kufJwwZ13+Pjb9sM 8LksiiYIG5Nt+MwZnEawel1JzbWoIDpQgUDvZ8obnLyZqFkly23z3Vn0LULdZxrH0a LPoITxHBmwKPCskGFNpUV/WhIYRqn+hPvm7XWr00GzdZC5XbPzXLqioMc+uqu6AVMt C1WSTw1eXZNGyn6DDF9Tym+ZmzVBY5Uq1urXoqNkKQYR9jnxke+n0sPqWNeZ1wHdV6 gyMbySrOBJjMvn5C/L++d860KPx5wYs6+PJKP1iR2Lw8sVQBG6nBFtrIFf6g70FEW/ OU4XaylQMgd0A==
To: Simon Perreault <Simon.Perreault=40logmein.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
From: "Emily Love Mills (she/her)" <emily@emlove.me>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "vcarddav@ietf.org" <vcarddav@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "Emily Love Mills (she/her)" <emily@emlove.me>
Message-ID: <I7FIYJNhaiTiZUm5XL4LroI-GY1nLF6ft3coT-kYHseTSf5tsVyTijLYIBeURjv14hko02LDt1Qfznnwa50oQjE94wtInCMqOg4NdkFTA2Q=@emlove.me>
In-Reply-To: <F6DECB6E-2F95-4E93-BB5C-18CD00360CA4@logmein.com>
References: <20220106202746.6E81CEC046@rfc-editor.org> <F6DECB6E-2F95-4E93-BB5C-18CD00360CA4@logmein.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vcarddav/zwDuVKLTTUy-5kH-8AbTEn-4l60>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6350 (6812)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vcarddav/>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 20:57:21 -0000

Agreed, this would be fine to include in the next RFC revision instead.

Emily Love Mills (she/her)
emily@emlove.me

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Thursday, January 6th, 2022 at 2:51 PM, Simon Perreault <Simon.Perreault=40logmein.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I don’t think this errata is correct. Yes it can easily be argued that the provided examples are better than the ones contained in the RFC, but the ones in the RFC are actually correct per protocol. That is, there is no bug. So I believe this is something that should be part of an eventual RFC revision, not an errata.
>
> Simon
>
> > On Jan 6, 2022, at 3:27 PM, RFC Errata System rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> >
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6350,
> >
> > "vCard Format Specification".
> >
> > You may review the report below and at:
> >
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6812;!!OA8L0MA-!uwnqxs4ZSZC4YW4XVGznKVl9Q39EmxKJ3pity_7RydbiDbXhc45tSkIibJg7XUWHoEqs$
> >
> > Type: Editorial
> >
> > Reported by: Emily Love Mills (she/her) emily@emlove.me
> >
> > Section: 6.2.7
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> >
> > Examples:
> >
> >     GENDER:M
> >     GENDER:F
> >     GENDER:M;Fellow
> >     GENDER:F;grrrl
> >     GENDER:O;intersex
> >     GENDER:;it's complicated
> >
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> >
> > Examples:
> >
> >     GENDER:M
> >     GENDER:F
> >     GENDER:M;Transgender Man
> >     GENDER:F;Transfeminine
> >     GENDER:O;Intersex
> >     GENDER:;Agender
> >
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> >
> > This errata replaces the imaginary gender identities with examples of actual diverse gender identities.
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> >
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> >
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> >
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> >
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > RFC6350 (draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-22)
> > -----------------------------------------
> >
> > Title : vCard Format Specification
> >
> > Publication Date : August 2011
> >
> > Author(s) : S. Perreault
> >
> > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
> >
> > Source : vCard and CardDAV
> >
> > Area : Applications
> >
> > Stream : IETF
> >
> > Verifying Party : IESG
> >
> > VCARDDAV mailing list
> >
> > VCARDDAV@ietf.org
> >
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav;!!OA8L0MA-!uwnqxs4ZSZC4YW4XVGznKVl9Q39EmxKJ3pity_7RydbiDbXhc45tSkIibJg7XZJbH1Sq$
>
> VCARDDAV mailing list
>
> VCARDDAV@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav