[Venue-selection] Feedback on Hiroshima, JP
Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net> Mon, 06 July 2020 15:53 UTC
Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: venue-selection@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: venue-selection@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F376F3A16C5 for <venue-selection@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id knnX206YgIQg for <venue-selection@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aws.hosed.org (aws.hosed.org [50.16.104.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B0F23A16C2 for <venue-selection@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aws.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDBCE014C for <venue-selection@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:53:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from aws.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aws.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J8BAV3AWRRPD for <venue-selection@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:53:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.63] (c-73-71-250-98.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.71.250.98]) by aws.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13536E014B for <venue-selection@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:53:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Message-Id: <6547AF3E-6801-41FF-BA6A-2692F62733AB@encrypted.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 08:53:05 -0700
To: venue-selection@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/venue-selection/FFqJtaSHVSVOXnnkkKytCuIO3yg>
Subject: [Venue-selection] Feedback on Hiroshima, JP
X-BeenThere: venue-selection@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Venue Selection <venue-selection.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/venue-selection>, <mailto:venue-selection-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/venue-selection/>
List-Post: <mailto:venue-selection@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:venue-selection-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/venue-selection>, <mailto:venue-selection-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 15:53:13 -0000
Hi,
(Assuming it's safe to travel/there's a vaccine..)
I am not a fan of traveling to Hiroshima. The BBF has met there a handful of times, and I've been, but I'm perplexed as to why we'd go there when there's Tokyo, which is a direct flight for a lot of us, has far more to offer in terms of accommodations/food/things to do, and for those who want to explore Japan, they'll often connect in Tokyo anyhow. I'd strongly prefer NOT to have Hiroshima as a city on the list. I understand we might want to change it up a bit, but I don't see what the upside here is, other than a change of scenery.
Thanks
Sarah
- [Venue-selection] Feedback on Hiroshima, JP Sarah Banks