aa08413;
          31 May 95 16:57 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id
aa08409;
          31 May 95 16:57 EDT
Received: from hp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16348; 31 May 95
16:57 EDT
Received: from hprnd.rose.hp.com by hp.com with ESMTP
     (1.37.109.15/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA299003862; Wed, 31 May 1995
13:57:43 -0700
Received: from hprnlkk.rose.hp.com by hprnd.rose.hp.com with SMTP
     (1.37.109.14/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA250473852; Wed, 31 May 1995
13:57:32 -0700
Received: by hprnlkk.rose.hp.com
     (1.38.193.4/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA15073; Wed, 31 May 1995
13:57:03 -0700
Sender:ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Karen Kimball <karenk@hprnlkk.rose.hp.com>
Message-Id: <9505312057.AA15073@hprnlkk.rose.hp.com>
Subject: re: Getting Started
To: vgmib@hprnd.rose.hp.com
Date: Wed, 31 May 95 13:57:03 PDT
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]

 
>     - IANA has currently assigned a single ifType for VG
interfaces.
>       Is this sufficient, or should we have different ifTypes for
>       ethernet and token ring framing modes?

     I'd suggest two different types.
 
     If you've got a bridge doing VG, and it's doing BOTH flavors
of VG, you'd definitely want to distinquish between those two
interfaces
as being more than just 'generic' VG.
 
 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 *   Karen Kimball                          * 
 *   Hewlett Packard                        *
 *   HP Roseville Networks Division         *
 *   Email: karenk@hprnd.rose.hp.com        *
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~