IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [video-codec] Proposed charter

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 05 November 2012 05:05 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63E421F88D4 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:05:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5oXKtrsuH2u2 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:05:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2A321F88C1 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:05:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.24] (unknown [50.73.80.245]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD7824012A; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:08:45 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <50974901.4000800@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:05:05 -0500
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <5032B6F5.7030402@xiph.org> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1118ADE45@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1118ADE45@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "<video-codec@ietf.org>" <video-codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [video-codec] Proposed charter
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 05:05:08 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/4/12 6:47 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
> 
> On Aug 20, 2012, at 18:15 , Timothy B. Terriberry
> <tterribe@xiph.org> wrote:
> 
>> 4. Specification of a storage format for non-interactive (HTTP) 
>> streaming or file transfer of the codec. It is envisioned that 
>> this document shall be a Proposed Standard document.
> 
> I think I would prefer to see this say something a little more 
> specific like do a storage format appropriate for use with DASH.
> If folks want to propose something other than DASH, sure, replace
> DASH with whatever, but my point is, I don't want this WG to be
> charter to do a DASH equivalent just as one of the sides topics.
> That is enough work it would need it's own WG.

Given the proposed use cases, I would have expected to see something
about packetization rather than storage; but we can discuss in the BoF
tomorrow if there's time, or on the list if not.

Peter (*not* as BoF co-chair)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlCXSQEACgkQNL8k5A2w/vy57wCePeUxxHHdYIUXLFXRqPE+qDtN
17QAoKhE7oSQ85TgYkEo3GjAdzrfJ3CJ
=Yuyi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email