IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 15 January 2013 04:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A4B21F8742 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:29:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.284
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.284 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60fZxO-sfFkM for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B2321F87CE for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:29:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=687; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1358224162; x=1359433762; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ZAgS8ijEXr0tH6Eyh7QicDNXIlmIg1YI5OsuDZR0PjQ=; b=MiTgQ5D8CC2XyWN/Yo1xrTTaD0ol/M8lCGVlSmWEQVbea0HIDsYEPahl oko4WH0gPd/pI+LyYkEN0hHI2UqJ+ROGE5c9zgLmGXYBz/+BSJuMOhDBY aPkYb/abIpEFi1aO6niK1I+eHMOyexv+9lys5jbl6nEuBUC+fpHRU+axf M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AogGAP/Z9FCtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABEhXO0SIM4FnOCHwEBBDo/EAIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQiIEagEjiaMa4NiYQOmVIJoDYIk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,469,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="162457308"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2013 04:29:22 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0F4TMDe010338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:29:22 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.197]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:29:21 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
Thread-Topic: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF
Thread-Index: AQHN8tjjhXjZvnaS90SBvlfIp4L5bQ==
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:29:20 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11337D323@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <20121106112625.2btpoxrylcgg8w4c@kizuka.merseine.nu>
In-Reply-To: <20121106112625.2btpoxrylcgg8w4c@kizuka.merseine.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7682F9B77604A9498260173A5708575C@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<video-codec@ietf.org>" <video-codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:29:23 -0000

On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe@xiph.org> wrote:

>> 
>> 3. Better plan for Liasons with other SDOs - particularly existing Joint *
> 
> So, I agree with Stephan's comments during the BoF that trying to set up something like the JCTVC with _both_ the ITU and ISO would be a multi-year effort in and of itself, making it somewhat impractical. But I certainly agree the current language in the charter on this subject could be improved. What text would people _like_ to see here?

I'd like to see it honestly describe what we intend to do. I would summarize that as "nothing" but we will let others know what we are up to.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email