Re: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF - licensing
"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org> Fri, 18 January 2013 14:36 UTC
Return-Path: <tterribe@xiph.org>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D1F21F8887 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:36:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLSTAC6VktRY for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:36:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E198C21F8888 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:36:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.16.25] (pool-96-241-176-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.176.56]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E98EDF20F3 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50F95DD2.1000005@xiph.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:36:02 -0800
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120625 SeaMonkey/2.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: video-codec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF - licensing
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:36:06 -0000
> I don't believe we will ever sort them out if we don't do it at this > stage and given they delayed opus for a year or more and still are > not really resolved, I think it would be worth spending the time now > to figure it out. So, we talked about posting some example license text to ietf@ietf.org to get feedback from others to increase the odds that people will choose to use similar terms, and we still plan to do that. I hope to have something ready before the draft deadline for the March meeting. What I worry about, of course, is that making WG formation blocking on this issue will delay the creation of the WG by a year or more.
- Re: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF - licen… Timothy B. Terriberry