IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 15 January 2013 04:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED0D21F87A6 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:29:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NP+JREIcmr48 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:29:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AB721F8742 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:29:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=661; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1358224156; x=1359433756; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=r9lfHSczoO4G1OLNg+zKHCcjVmiXJdilEQGbjYTdfMY=; b=RyKUrmudfW/h8Cr/Y5DdPyqQcxrOF4HXJc694cGfq00RZx4o0uY4QeGj 6NUJSOuItvBGdii7lNjiUPxqLd9i2ODHvHoSPVrgxqTqfh0X7QH0hIZht l1dxcujh7a1UVmjZ5TVEM4hWksfWnBQyDnQAlJgXKczB1pu9zzgmmHJYZ A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AokGAEHa9FCtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABEhXO0SIM4FnOCHgEBAQMBOjoFEAIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQiICwaoBI4mjGuDYmEDlyePLYJoDYIk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,469,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="162208956"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2013 04:29:16 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0F4TFRm011999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:29:16 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.197]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:29:15 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
Thread-Topic: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF
Thread-Index: AQHN8tjgZyWcHroNpUikCY6xOF7gzw==
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:29:15 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11337D307@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <20121106112625.2btpoxrylcgg8w4c@kizuka.merseine.nu>
In-Reply-To: <20121106112625.2btpoxrylcgg8w4c@kizuka.merseine.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <92BBB584C9C06442BC750CED2DAE82F9@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<video-codec@ietf.org>" <video-codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [video-codec] Charter issues from BoF
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:29:20 -0000

On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe@xiph.org> wrote:

>> 4. Sort out preferred licensing terms early.
> 
> We (Xiph.Org/Mozilla) obviously have some strong preferences here. You can look at our Opus disclosures to see what they are. Given the strong reactions against discussing such issues on the list with Opus, I'm hesitant to specify what those terms should be in the charter.

I don't believe we will ever sort them out if we don't do it at this stage and given they delayed opus for a year or more and still are not really resolved, I think it would be worth spending the time now to figure it out.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email