[VIPR] vipr-overview-06
"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Thu, 12 December 2013 23:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: vipr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vipr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676141AE139 for <vipr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:23:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gK0flSBveo7I for <vipr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:23:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from neustar.com (smartmail.neustar.com [156.154.25.104]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A961AE07D for <vipr@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:23:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neustar.biz; s=neustarbiz; t=1386890634; x=1702236150; q=dns/txt; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Language: Content-Type; bh=Mq7OVe5gN/vF+JmAf/GfnZzIt1dztGg9gfNWalDT8Fo=; b=d8lnsNnCwF1ubYWh34Th0XZHVlUGH4nBBLnzbSfLzvvEqL55yHZZpxJARcs9DT 8HN7FjUuEhm/CqgM1jPCfSfA==
Received: from ([10.31.58.70]) by chihiron2.nc.neustar.com with ESMTP with TLS id J041123125.30941908; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:23:53 -0500
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.245]) by stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:22:57 -0500
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
To: "vipr@ietf.org" <vipr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: vipr-overview-06
Thread-Index: AQHO95EXxM+mSnbfFEGJsRuzJOEZew==
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:22:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CECF854E.CBE6F%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613
x-originating-ip: [192.168.129.151]
x-ems-proccessed: R64IxjzeHPwwd+efoj3ZcA==
x-ems-stamp: bsde+YaIz3eBxp9rkRlqJQ==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CECF854ECBE6Fjonpetersonneustarbiz_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [VIPR] vipr-overview-06
X-BeenThere: vipr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Verification Involving PSTN Reachability working group <vipr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vipr>, <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vipr/>
List-Post: <mailto:vipr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vipr>, <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:23:08 -0000
At the seasonal risk of raising a Ghost of Working Groups Past - for those of you still on this list, please do note the recent publication of vipr-overview-06. This document is no longer being considered as a Standards Track RFC, or even as a working group item of this now-defunct effort. It is being considered now as an individual Informational submission that documents the VIPR architecture for the benefit of posterity, but also explains why we stopped working on VIPR as a potential Standard. If you are still interested, please do read this document and send any comments to this list. For the most part, useful comments at this point will be those that point out respects in which vipr-overview either fails to characterize the VIPR system or fails to correctly document its shortcomings. The new section 7.5 of the overview document is a good place to read up on the latter. It would be great to see any comments before the end of the year. After that, this mailing list will formally give up the ghost. Jon Peterson Neustar, Inc.
- [VIPR] vipr-overview-06 Peterson, Jon
- Re: [VIPR] vipr-overview-06 Michael Procter