Re: [VIPR] VIPR privacy issue

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: vipr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vipr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A4221F84CF for <vipr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:07:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IrL-dG15rPrb for <vipr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:07:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CBB21F84CD for <vipr@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbwd15 with SMTP id wd15so5477915obb.31 for <vipr@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.41.36 with SMTP id c4mr7359825obl.21.1328288863569; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.116] (cpe-66-25-15-110.tx.res.rr.com. [66.25.15.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q9sm7745846obk.4.2012.02.03.09.07.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:07:42 -0800 (PST)
References: <4F1F1A42.1030201@acm.org> <9734F726-C0A8-42D6-87A4-65535D5F3E80@bbn.com> <4F217CC9.4080802@acm.org> <50D0BC87-EC6C-401E-A2F9-A05AC60D5EF0@bbn.com> <4F2183D0.3070809@acm.org> <373FB643-AE7A-473C-A7AB-09F9A9E7093B@bbn.com> <4F21A121.10403@acm.org> <5466D9E6-3859-41A7-9A54-D23DC6D775C6@iii.ca> <E9DCDEA3-5BDC-41E6-B2BE-606E4CCE4F1B@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <E9DCDEA3-5BDC-41E6-B2BE-606E4CCE4F1B@bbn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <00A1AC3E-167F-4243-9F1B-345AC99D2409@softarmor.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:07:40 -0600
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "vipr@ietf.org" <vipr@ietf.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Subject: Re: [VIPR] VIPR privacy issue
X-BeenThere: vipr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Verification Involving PSTN Reachability working group <vipr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vipr>, <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vipr>
List-Post: <mailto:vipr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vipr>, <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:07:44 -0000

On Jan 27, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:

> <hat type="geopriv"/>
> 
> Could we please distinguish between "location privacy" and "IP address privacy"?  They are related, but distinct concepts.
> 

Yep. Mobile IP can give us location privacy without IP address privacy.

Hmm ...  a separate RELOAD usage for MobileIP, then bootstrap VIPR on top of that. Might work.

What ever happened to HIP, anyhow? We're just dancing around the locator-separator problem here.

--
Dean