IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Sat, 09 April 2016 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8BB12D0CA for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -113.617
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-113.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3Z8qb3p2WPR for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0F312D0E4 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2617; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1460227611; x=1461437211; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=SPBRkVPRJkkNuDR2wuNZ7uCeDkBr48oQR5XUXB227g0=; b=BGFFBstKdD20wWgk4Q4irPMVpjPm4iEfEcIvXS24NMAVw890FNsZjwUi 2qAftARRKrDnNy/k/dcsj2Q4qnO1+PvTqdfJBAQ83k7POFT0vMtsnq9QA jkvTI7FOrg/mSR2gpqhrOyjoOqhGVhHBJ7zCxOcxmz2bgIvim0J8FEmRi Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BeBQAFTQlX/5ldJa1cgzeBQQ8GvE+GD?= =?us-ascii?q?QKBKjwQAQEBAQEBAWUnhEEBAQEDAXkFCwIBCBguMiUCBA4FDogRCLowAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDQiIFoJWhA6DXIIrBZgEAYMjgWaJAo8NjyUBNyuDZ?= =?us-ascii?q?2yILn4BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,460,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="259566024"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Apr 2016 18:46:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u39Iko2r015251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:46:50 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 13:46:49 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 13:46:49 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [vmeet] Suggestion
Thread-Index: AQHRkbfGxg4KeG3+SEeInYF/sVjJ5p+A9FeA
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:46:49 +0000
Message-ID: <2085AE38-23BB-4FDF-AB30-455F3505435E@cisco.com>
References: <62592448-DE03-4FAA-9974-1DF2899CA02E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <62592448-DE03-4FAA-9974-1DF2899CA02E@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.119]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BDDF7EB9-4017-49CB-AD8E-77CA907EFCB6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/3ief2cPKW4dEDk2ogXXQR0bwBjg>
Cc: "lee.howard@twcable.com" <lee.howard@twcable.com>, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Mirja Kuehlwind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Suggestion
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 18:46:54 -0000

> On Apr 8, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) <jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> We could also have a pre-made chair deck with the meeting title, date, time, chair names slide, a note well, and a slide with the agenda as loaded into the tools site.  All of the stuff that every chair has to do before every meeting should be automatable.  I know everyone likes things a little different, so you don't *have* to use the deck if you don't want to.

Something I noticed (it's probably been announced, but I managed to miss it) is the when I upload a pptx, it is very quickly converted to pdf. That's a good thing, but presents an issue. Personally, I use powerpoint builds (adding content to a slide as if there was a subsequent slide with a little more content) when I give a talk, and pdf doesn't do that. The net effect is that I'm thinking about a way of explaining something and in effect drawing on the whiteboard as the slide progresses, and pdf reduces that to the least common denominator.

So if I were expecting, as a presenter, to use a build, and the display deck magically became pdf, I don't think I would feel that I had achieved what I wanted to achieve.

So I would want it to be really easy to override this.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email