[vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 06 October 2016 03:47 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C267129413
for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 20:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id J0fTTdatlUKe for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Oct 2016 20:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22e.google.com (mail-yb0-x22e.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22e])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB4B127058
for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 20:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 184so1438065yby.2
for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=EAenQZ4GKpSfJn9UDEWiklfWDm8TiMLp1BHYjJuqlyI=;
b=ZmJRH20qkCOYfEsM8BgzG/v4CW+bXCxGA4gOrhsOBfVFsw0EUVeuU/Z/bDzieYmWqe
luMBimy/0YlrOx/QSAwW8AsIrvN4daBEcoaXuY25hVnX4iHWHncvNegsd+CiVOrW7biU
r0IYcsqCf9mJ+uaMV2ZNGWwlx6OJAgQ2DnVxdHUvg934u+UmflHsN/gq1QdCIzAx1NFP
BHgLaz8pSgjaIsa8zC92FyNu4FYY8kFkaZP/Y9Ss5CmG8zpiEimiBho/qcDWnwwmYZx2
Nc5hWlr0XBJXknCHdm/ygcKq/tzZQAmsy3TWxkFWfc8PPAjoud2wvLpLfnvK1YEn5s3x
mrnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=EAenQZ4GKpSfJn9UDEWiklfWDm8TiMLp1BHYjJuqlyI=;
b=R2cjUraubzCtjxaJBNo32rnMnW7MtKPa2mRBERQmiqCbp2dbgPOScD/hiAPz5wuQ9Q
/KaDLYY8pAE41nbDE6440zRsZSVWXlH++87eX3i+CM7irMhoORVjr1jUHtK3e7CJF81T
bDV6M/G1bFRgJPLGJACYT8VfTJVofEkNd9k8Q6EKp7ZIe/6whbf1rjNiz+U+KiLK8i6Y
Vk777HeRcDZ2sEVLXykwlKgVhoc8LuWgNNCq1yD4sfmoqCNDWCi05+Eu4td6ODMJYVK8
EiJccR4wrlgfxShw4N8/1qKeeTeASLOEftRikhJWa44FMPjJOOfJJQEIHZpg+YFnA02O
IE6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rl/fNX6muX8ntn9SrD00pvuO5xVXhZCPg7DfOVpN6tlrHNcJGrxKa6F4dLI9SxAul/HaVMMZHev+1gICQ==
X-Received: by 10.37.97.203 with SMTP id v194mr5504164ybb.149.1475725676180;
Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.56.133 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 20:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 23:47:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1re1td4oaPpHMHn7Ka4OYT37B6QRsygM1uvWZhDTzqyJGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: vmeet@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142ee40b6f8e3053e2a2804
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/8zjJl7OqNTvdpVyOcwyLHWPmnno>
Subject: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>,
<mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>,
<mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 03:47:58 -0000
I am curious about how the various IETF Hubs have been doing? What activities have you tried and found useful/successful/interesting? What did you try that failed miserably? Do you have a community organizer (or group of folks) pushing the organization of the activities and facilitating? Do you have different people stepping up to pull things together? What is your participation like? Is it largely experienced IETFers? researchers & students? interested developers? Personally, I'm brainstorming a bit about what might be useful to try in the Boston Hub and how much to push or encourage structure. It feels like some can be quite useful. Thanks, Alia
- [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs? Alia Atlas
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… Christian O'Flaherty
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… Dave Crocker
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… John Leslie
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… Christian O'Flaherty
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… Vinayak Hegde
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… Alia Atlas
- Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in h… Vinayak Hegde