IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] finding the IETF Hubs

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087231295C9 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:51:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jg3Jo5K-eYcz for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:51:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8C7129566 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:51:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n21so159503635qka.3 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:51:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qPv2y6rC13mkKh5MRRu9uq0zVI5bQR3+5z5Uugr85T8=; b=Fcgz9FgOVRTJ/LB5mc+2ZibBaxO+mra9vNvth9+s9MppZSL5q3/KXukDr3Za8pNdKV m6Qip6PbZTX6gTgmYS59Ob+kcfAKzY1Ge2t/tOj2yYuOR/FY4oc1CpplGnOboK878z18 hggpFDgT+Y+MNVx62oQOzayZ3/1Q6lHmh/nDubOvHBPZs9I8kG6BDaa1dcH6FuicWrNt BmHizKJU5ckf7F9uYa/yjMjJwmM9/AkgGbxEW/cov6ZtSbzorV6FqJlV2qt/hG0B+0zP GRHAy00WiLMaoNJ9JfuEnzRiVgJ2vvQK8ztYWqsk09bmSNQ4R45wptdLDc1vDb1vgWLp ZVaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qPv2y6rC13mkKh5MRRu9uq0zVI5bQR3+5z5Uugr85T8=; b=eB0H62HJjISIgsH7Jny4LtDGTAq56FbOB1YCaerzpbfSnq8kEzAp3Px8dLaBhHH1nD +0SZxXY3D+3W4Z5TrBqg2b+tyFmcADCb6A7nBsU2ZYeh3Ii2SqQLwAk6JxoXolmoGPkB MnFZ9scDgpn4XA50pfhrA6eR8dvokAhUF2i92O8joHma49xvC3SPqBADXMQlRCD4DIRA 0jsLTRJWMIRFqto7jXaFEfM/CPNw63rvaIjqn3/+pOeW+viioE+3I51RQE7Tp37vlgJK vaPqyqmp4dq5bSTmhoNGCYrX+3jKv+QooRbX1IqNoDOSq9KVHlbt+O1Ox/V2PsRhLNnf YYyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02s+IsdgUhPdoXbN35UHwBgNxeejW0KR9UTUC0AoqA4g2FdQDAxChXkoxWIshZC8dPaDtszXabsLPUylg==
X-Received: by 10.55.76.150 with SMTP id z144mr807843qka.194.1479264707484; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:51:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.34.228 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:51:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn5QMZmdm+gDy8KiOeKTMQxnbiiG2Dddhrgj1a5NAzvZFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG4d1rd69WLyfy42qg-58-qkehk3=5opHAk2fRsRbk2VSXvu8A@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn5QMZmdm+gDy8KiOeKTMQxnbiiG2Dddhrgj1a5NAzvZFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:51:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1reUn9ds6sN4UOf=30A56QTZi_WKKEYZCsRrQo8oQDESng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a88686b24db05416227e1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/El8_n08pNfhut4fg4xDKKNOStfM>
Cc: vmeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] finding the IETF Hubs
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:51:50 -0000

Hi Dhruv,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alia,
>
> This time we did not have a hub in Bangalore.
>
> The good news is some of the participants that were in Bangalore Hub
> before, are in fact attending this IETF, and are part of Hackathon/WGs.
>
> IMHO remote participants (especially who have attended an IETF meeting
> before) prefer using meetecho or seeing the recording later offline
> independently.
>

I absolutely agree - and have seen that myself.


> Thus the Hub needs to offer more than just the logistics of the remote
> meeting, it should be an opportunity for discussions, networking etc. Which
> can offer something for the new and the experienced participants. We are
> planning a few things so, that we can organize hubs which are more engaging
> in the future.
>

This - plus getting the energy and knowledge of those who are attending the
physical IETF meetings - is why in Boston we're focusing on having meetings
that don't conflict with the IETF meetings.  The one tech talk meeting went
well, though we didn't get as high as even 20 attendees.

I've been referring to the groups as IETF Hubs or IETF Community Hubs - b/c
I think that does reflect more accurately where we are heading - rather
than remote hubs.

Regards,
Alia



> Thanks!
> Dhruv
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I also tried to find more details on the hubs by looking in the wiki at
>> the page for Remote Hubs for IETF 97 (https://www.ietf.org/registra
>> tion/MeetingWiki/wiki/ietf97#remote_hubs ) but the page hasn't even been
>> created.
>>
>> It is useful to have this information.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
>> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
>>
>>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email