IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee

Dan York <york@isoc.org> Sun, 10 April 2016 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <york@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B4E12D1EA for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 02:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isoc.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CI7d1-DMEdaT for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 02:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0096.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6781412D1AD for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 02:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isoc.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-isoc-org; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=/8PkHOvlbZt8EY864xJB3k+tlsDjghefVU3pSE6XX8k=; b=m6075skhwmzETyMwjBSniRSTEl0tRlSfWL5WLGtd9k6cYKDTg19z0l5yFAay38uIhcTQVub8sRmIYSgDwBDNQA6XOjsXlG11fxg5jjffe4Xp/kDRACfe1IzQUOLlprDchpwvT2yt/t+rsAYgrkryAbh7gaqaAt+UKmH3jHbokZY=
Received: from CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.163.232.19) by CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.163.232.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.453.26; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:41:52 +0000
Received: from CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.232.19]) by CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.232.19]) with mapi id 15.01.0453.028; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:41:52 +0000
From: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
To: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
Thread-Topic: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee
Thread-Index: AQHRkcoPRdGMKaRIXUi3ArmbCdm1GZ+A4/eAgAFChQA=
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:41:52 +0000
Message-ID: <6EC9873F-B427-475B-B187-BE352676C4C9@isoc.org>
References: <D51111F6-66B9-4FAF-9B6D-FF9AE7E20D0D@att.com> <5707FBD9.6070506@gmail.com> <20160409020147.GA3997@verdi>
In-Reply-To: <20160409020147.GA3997@verdi>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: jlc.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;jlc.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=isoc.org;
x-originating-ip: [74.69.229.215]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7954fc8f-2c7b-4050-492e-08d3612458de
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0601MB1657; 5:HJDzo7TxF4tREh3oyk/a3EgtjTyXiT3t+H4Z3vP/WLWQ1s0yn3qo+BAg6q+cX+fr/VpCdzRkqVyD2z5l3UjP5seQ9i/xz/nnu/KQCgsxUyDu3bhyUTe6hJIGMOaskRQTYo/RZ1MLtHls6Zqm1fpT+Q==; 24:wSRA73r6kVUez8+NppQV1rgnBnUcKwL9MkYNKdBE6ITPS9QYoAZOmZ5IaeH2HmL8GzL4c/8Q40qJrkbhK7Z/uifWuRvKHaDfGLLyYJTjUEU=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0601MB1657;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR0601MB165794681E832859A9F4F61CB7930@CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:CY1PR0601MB1657; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0601MB1657;
x-forefront-prvs: 09086FB5C5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(54094003)(52024003)(52314003)(2906002)(189998001)(110136002)(106116001)(83716003)(5004730100002)(87936001)(122556002)(50986999)(54356999)(76176999)(82746002)(11100500001)(99286002)(92566002)(3280700002)(5008740100001)(81166005)(5002640100001)(77096005)(2900100001)(2950100001)(33656002)(86362001)(36756003)(1096002)(1220700001)(10400500002)(66066001)(102836003)(6116002)(3846002)(4326007)(3660700001)(586003)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0601MB1657; H:CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C05F70EE52E8404DAF7A63F36E21B604@isoc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Apr 2016 09:41:52.5645 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0601MB1657
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/FDKic0cezB-5R010jTvFNs_sWX8>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:41:57 -0000

John,

Great feedback. I was in BA this time but have been remote other times. 
Comments inline:

>   It got decidedly worse as the week wore on; so I suspect a memory
> problem; 

I wonder if there was an increase in usage during the week, either of Meetecho or also of the IETF network.  We may be able to find out from the Meetecho or NOC team.

> By the end of the week, I was usually selecting the HTML5 audio,
> and it lasted through the session. 

I have always liked having the option of the audio-only streams for just having that go on in the background.

> Serious debugging _during_ IETF-week really doesn't make sense;
> but we ought to do it 

I agree... BUT... I wonder if we can actually replicate the necessary conditions outside of during an actual IETF week.  It seems to me the loads on the Meetecho servers and network may only be possible during an event week... But there may be other ways to add load.

Anyway, good comments! Thanks for the report,
Dan

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email