IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] [Tools-discuss] meetecho for remote presenters

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 05 April 2016 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2C012D5CC; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AN5XJ_iCKR3y; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307D312D184; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986AB2009E; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:31:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CB06375A; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:28:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Meetecho IETF support <ietf@meetecho.com>
In-Reply-To: <5702E6B0.9060305@meetecho.com>
References: <22117.1459805337@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5702E6B0.9060305@meetecho.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:28:07 -0400
Message-ID: <1355.1459888087@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/FKt_pjfvEpdrvAiT7EYSQDHmWIk>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, vmeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] [Tools-discuss] meetecho for remote presenters
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 20:28:10 -0000

Meetecho IETF support <ietf@meetecho.com> wrote:
    > Il 04/04/2016 23:28, Michael Richardson ha scritto:
    >>
    >> I did the same presentation twice today in two WGs (to deal with cross-WG
    >> issues).
    >>
    >> Things that I would like to have:
    >> 1) big video with small slides.
    >> the choices are
    >> - big slides and many video, or
    >> - video fills entire screen, no slides.

    > thanks for the feedback. We'll try to implement this in the next versions of
    > the platform.

My suggestion is not the consider the slides to be special.
Instead, it's just another video source, just like the other video sources.
Let me have 1,2 or 3 video sources in 2 or 3 size choices.

As a remote presenter, I need to see that the correct slide is on the screen,
but I otherwise, prefer to see the audience, and I think they'd prefer to see
me looking at them.

On my two screen display at home, with my usb camera snuggled between my two
screens, it works best if I locate my 1/3 sized web browser halfway between
the two screens so that I'm looking straight into the camera.  Given that,
I'd want to have the audience in the middle, and the slides and chairs on the
two sides.

I understood that we would be moving from single moveable camera to two
cameras in the future ?

Well..., my Berlin ticket is already paid for, but I think using meetecho in
fully virtual mode might be useful for virtual interim meetings.
Is this an option?   Would the IESG or IAB like to dogfood it?

I know that we also have JITSI; the ship has sailed on webex in my opinion.
I supposed we are still missing the "dialin" option.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email