Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" telepresence
Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 09 April 2009 18:29 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963693A6C8E for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 571hnhVVwW13 for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F813A6C34 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.3.129] ([209.113.205.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n39IU4cw026540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:30:10 -0700
Message-ID: <49DE384F.50401@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:02:55 -0400
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
References: <071601c9b7c0$407cbbd0$c1763370$@net> <20090407211241.GD507@cisco.com> <074701c9b7ce$b1539280$13fab780$@net> <49DD9183.7070701@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <49DD9183.7070701@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: vmeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" telepresence
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:29:14 -0000
Eliot Lear wrote: > What I am saying is that I assert that interaction in a large group is > quite different than an intimate group, and we should be careful to not > over-engineer, and also to assume that a modest change in behavior is > possible. +10 /d -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" te… Brian Rosen
- [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" telepr… Brian Rosen
- Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" te… Scott Brim
- Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" te… Brian Rosen
- Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" te… Eliot Lear
- Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" te… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" te… Scott Brim
- Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" te… Fred Baker
- Re: [vmeet] What is takes to have "successful" te… Doug Otis