IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 10 April 2016 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7208112D5A7 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pNDjpKv5x5AW for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DE5112D5A0 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-10-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.10.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u3ADxEOl027152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:14 -0700
References: <D51111F6-66B9-4FAF-9B6D-FF9AE7E20D0D@att.com> <5707FBD9.6070506@gmail.com> <20160409020147.GA3997@verdi> <6EC9873F-B427-475B-B187-BE352676C4C9@isoc.org> <87y48la90r.fsf@tops.chopps.org>
To: "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <570A5C2D.4040507@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:09 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87y48la90r.fsf@tops.chopps.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/QZTotMupIiKjaisZ11GRbMeu6eI>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:59:16 -0000

>>                   It
>> seems to me the loads on the Meetecho servers and network may only
>> be possible during an event week... But there may be other ways to
>> add load.
>
> Perhaps if there was an announced testing/debugging sessions on Fri
> or Sat prior we could get a lot of people to join. Friday would be
> best b/c


+1


d/

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email