IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 10 October 2016 05:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35F6129404 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LhWcO0QMPL5w for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53DFB126FDC for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id i202so100014919ioi.2 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 22:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=wQYxuH/FB7+8Zxq73v+Ec61hGuFdtgoAAOFO6DJW1xk=; b=jqaBYuSSxEuGio+FsRqjvjQ7rgmnvlyUkCtq1lJoQwXiAb7+n6gSkCwYkue2oU2BxR iH5eKTJOiz9wmxv4BI2RaJvfy6yj90HIr8ANJeEUsUpAlbECxRlN+nboVo57x3Gluewi Dxq3No/BC4YL+15o30j7orF0fUcvi8lV7jmJknRfrt7+QifG6RbMpcCzugvjslG53WWL jfBdHaXdiUZyBQVAGAmlgACcB69NEz41E1uJp5BtUeeYb+IYzrb4TuR8KstTm64nK21H JZ0sswlKjN/WOyzG4639myqPbsk0NK79CgZOSdjUsMdU8hGkFCu7KI7xLVLukAjASmhC dpFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wQYxuH/FB7+8Zxq73v+Ec61hGuFdtgoAAOFO6DJW1xk=; b=i3e1lUK9K2gAqCQWmNlx6/rH2g9UmZqln4Tq+sglc3Ds2Am4ybpP7HayKhCCqdQGFu 9+ZK6L4bvKk39WEuhDf8k+2FRKZZa/Q9AxMHbu04c6ZGQW7VdAoelemlJ5WxhcXOYy4a smSxgSEcwswO4E0GPB6K8AnhFVvLSs3M1saZOvLdu4VXxDYvNtizQeXtGSpaqewK4zNd XFBlmq7xxM6dDf0YGZ6YtCvVdonfTPCsdm1C7twIR0YWaoa6DVOzZPrD/SJ+P23KC2ew kEl7rzXSfZpRx8Iu14NLtEygMvQjzFNMrK7jixbE1O44ZyzIFKeioJvwetlijmwBuqof ENzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rn7GWSD3vqdVaUhsqlZhEaY7Xz8AdAMF17BlTIuXNohsxitPmhzBa0baitkM1ho3OLycp+Jr7qDQPWUUA==
X-Received: by 10.107.148.4 with SMTP id w4mr267826iod.135.1476076009531; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 22:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.227.43 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1re1td4oaPpHMHn7Ka4OYT37B6QRsygM1uvWZhDTzqyJGA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG4d1re1td4oaPpHMHn7Ka4OYT37B6QRsygM1uvWZhDTzqyJGA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:36:48 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: zCkxKbrazV1nfiCjWlzSDlAQFdU
Message-ID: <CAB75xn79vU1xyv9Bk=5LHjDekRkO9ARwN9A8pCXRhuJF5Cm9vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fe12235ad7d053e7bba5e
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/U9829eZfb9t_X6cFNi1bOv2_fBc>
Cc: vmeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 05:06:53 -0000

Hi Alia,

Our IETF 94 hub in Bangalore was quite successful. The makeup was made up
of a few IETFers but mostly interested developers.  In fact, some of the
participants went on to attend and present in IETF 96 and took part in the
Hackathon. They are also planning to join IETF 97 in Seoul.

I am on the look out for new blood to both organize/attend for IETF 97.

Just a few thoughts -

(1) WG champion: Having one or two WG champion at the Hub helped to set the
tone, go over the WG agenda in advance, answer questions and continue the
discussion after the WG meeting.

(2) Discussions/Hot-Topics: Most participants can join remotely on their
own from home/work. We need to make it worthwhile for someone to travel to
the Hub, so it is important that we make sure that the hub can offer
something more.... This could be a lively discussion, networking, side
meetings on some HOT technology, tutorial etc.

(3) Agenda - getting the IETF agenda early, would help a lot in making the
sub-set agenda for the hub based on interest/timezone etc.

This is just for the Hub in Bangalore, there have been other hubs in India
targeting academia.

Regards,
Dhruv

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am curious about how the various IETF Hubs have been doing?
> What activities have you tried and found useful/successful/interesting?
> What did you try that failed miserably?
>
> Do you have a community organizer (or group of folks) pushing the
> organization
> of the activities and facilitating?  Do you have different people stepping
> up to pull things together?
>
> What is your participation like?  Is it largely experienced IETFers?
>  researchers & students? interested developers?
>
> Personally, I'm brainstorming a bit about what might be useful to try in
> the Boston Hub and how much to push or encourage structure.  It feels like
> some can be quite useful.
>
> Thanks,
> Alia
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email