Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Sun, 10 April 2016 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C5C12B048 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r84C1w4oEI26 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE53612B041 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-10-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.10.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u3AHFmrN000854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:15:48 -0700
To: Meetecho IETF support <ietf@meetecho.com>, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
References: <62592448-DE03-4FAA-9974-1DF2899CA02E@cisco.com> <640096FA-BD5A-4149-85D4-361323910EF0@isoc.org> <5707F0FF.8050806@dcrocker.net> <570A87E7.50009@meetecho.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <570A8A3F.70604@bbiw.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:15:43 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <570A87E7.50009@meetecho.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/Xu9JMvYLiN6WBNU_mu-LNXw8TRM>
Cc: "lee.howard@twcable.com" <lee.howard@twcable.com>, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>, Mirja Kuehlwind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, team@meetecho.com
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Suggestion
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:15:56 -0000

On 4/10/2016 10:05 AM, Meetecho IETF support wrote:
> as you may remember, this feature is already there.


Yes.  The challenge is to get people in the face2face room to participate.

 From the experiments, this appears to involve a combination of an 
interface for them to use and, of course, the training to get that use.

Based on those experiments, this issue appears to be a significant 
challenge in terms of usability design...

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net