Re: [vmeet] Stockholm

Carolin Latze <carolin.latze@unifr.ch> Tue, 28 July 2009 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <carolin.latze@unifr.ch>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBFA3A67BD for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.129
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PWc6Wb0yS+9g for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from siufsrv105.unifr.ch (siufsrv105.unifr.ch [134.21.14.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB503A6F8A for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sr-blw-201.unifr.ch ([134.21.40.64]) by siufsrv105.unifr.ch stage1 with esmtp with id 1MVoND-0004yw-K6 from <carolin.latze@unifr.ch>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:13:51 +0200
Received: from [130.129.23.233] (130.129.23.233) by post.unifr.ch (134.21.39.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.375.2; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:13:50 +0200
Message-ID: <4A6F15AF.50706@unifr.ch>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:13:51 +0200
From: Carolin Latze <carolin.latze@unifr.ch>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <wbeebee@cisco.com>
References: <20090727055308.GB9935@verdi><20090727060258.6E99D9A4726@odin.smetech.net> <1248704898.5653.91.camel@scott> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A0302C80C84@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A0302C80C84@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4125-5.600.1016-16790.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--26.012600-8.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Cc: "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Stockholm
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:14:16 -0000

Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote:
> I'm presenting remotely in v6ops tomorrow.  Hopefully, these problems
> will be worked out by the time I need to present.
>   
Seems to work pretty good. What is your impression on the remote side?

Carolin
> - Wes 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vmeet-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vmeet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Scott Lawrence
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 10:28 AM
> To: Russ Housley
> Cc: vmeet@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [vmeet] Stockholm
>
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 02:02 -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
>
>   
>> Only Dispatch and V6Ops have remote presenters that are going to use 
>> WebEx.  We hope to make more use of this capability in the future, but
>>     
>
>   
>> the needed technical information to connect to the meeting room system
>>     
>
>   
>> was not available to us before we got on site.  So, we are only going 
>> to focus on the two sessions that need to support remote presenters.
>>     
>
> I was one of those remote presenters (the DISPATCH session).  I decided
> to cancel my presentation rather than attempt it remotely.
>
> This was only in part due to the difficulties in being remote, but they
> were a factor: in particular, the total lack of information on how
> remote participation would work, what I would need at my end, and the
> fact that WebEx won't work from my normal Linux work environment.  I was
> not able to find any information at all (despite repeated requests) on
> how I could test anything in advance.
>
> There were other contributing factors - I'm not blaming my decision to
> cancel on the poor support for remote presentation, but it was very
> poor.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
>