Re: [vmeet] Apr 23: webex group experiment

Doug Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com> Thu, 16 April 2009 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B27E3A6979 for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNrvTA9pXMbR for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E663A6D28 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l35so292701waf.5 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=hnE177zMUsu/8eZ12FAEONTEqxQVwK448wfaF9HmGyI=; b=kcagva20QH6kQF5tUTaxtYYT13gjhkzsj6lJdxEEYKITPIRtkOdX0wPg8SfCfLWgHp 7FtijJR3+SIug1BcUNw7dSOXYkGkcJs+mIR1wjJuxMJBUKxuJNIdN10AD1bZvByUgklb 27JVP1YgsZOPvTkMCuYY1KWnHG+i79XkoIyEQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=TFPkKLpP7RzkWIEeDDfY/f5WKspSDoEwPCbLyRBG58dBDL2zm9gIbcnIBdwUmyi2cz JTIXzc8YvW1pIL4x9QOguNas1Udi6GfGzYGB6soFu65NcpHcBC6KPey/8XAI2TvtHzWC WqMw2HXhyBupn0nfnepGlAWe6AtFTITR44Koc=
Received: by 10.114.134.20 with SMTP id h20mr991300wad.116.1239919435497; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SJC-Office-NAT-219.mail-abuse.org (SJC-Office-NAT-219.mail-abuse.org [168.61.10.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k35sm1873458waf.19.2009.04.16.15.03.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <E62C6CCD-5C78-4254-9FF8-988AEC3B52CE@gmail.com>
From: Doug Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <200904162018.n3GKISLs012182@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:03:37 -0700
References: <49DE44DD.4060202@dcrocker.net> <200904162018.n3GKISLs012182@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: vMeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Apr 23: webex group experiment
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:02:43 -0000

On Apr 16, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:

> I've never used WebEx, but just going to the web page, I see I can  
> sign up for a 14-day trial. Then I presumably have to pay $$. Or,  
> someone has to pay to run the server, and then there is some limited  
> number of clients that can connect.
>
> Can someone explain please explain the licensing model with WebEx?  
> And how use of this technology by the IETF will preserve the  
> expected openness where everyone/anyone can participate?

The IETF could meet in public squares, but one might assume there is  
no problem meeting in conference centers where fees are also  
required.  To afford the productivity benefit of rooms, chairs, walls,  
lights, projectors, network access, etc. members must individually  
offset a portion of these meeting related fees.

WebEx is no different from the meeting rooms needed to conduct  
meetings and appears to support a wide range of clients.  The breath  
of support that WebEx offers represents an investment in remote  
meeting services on par with running brick and mortar conference  
centers.  Once members become familiar with remote meeting services,  
an effort might be undertaken to explore suitable suites of  
applications that could act as alternatives.  After all, the IETF  
should have the synergy for such an effort.

Nevertheless, don't expect replacements offering similar productivity  
will not also demand similar additional resources.   As such, remote  
participation aided by remote meeting services beyond streaming audio- 
feeds and jabber sessions is likely to necessitate minor offset fees.   
For many, these remote participation fees will be in lieu of  
substantial air and hotel arrangements, and lost time due to traveling.

-Doug