IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee

<chopps@chopps.org> Sun, 10 April 2016 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E17912D591 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gfg6uI0yhTXH for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D16912D58E for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tops.chopps.org (24-247-68-31.dhcp.trcy.mi.charter.com [24.247.68.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B77C61176; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:27:49 +0000 (UTC)
References: <D51111F6-66B9-4FAF-9B6D-FF9AE7E20D0D@att.com> <5707FBD9.6070506@gmail.com> <20160409020147.GA3997@verdi> <6EC9873F-B427-475B-B187-BE352676C4C9@isoc.org>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1
From: <chopps@chopps.org>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
In-reply-to: <6EC9873F-B427-475B-B187-BE352676C4C9@isoc.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:27:48 -0400
Message-ID: <87y48la90r.fsf@tops.chopps.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/oU0uifJEGWo5h4yEPLxEOSw16PM>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:27:54 -0000

Dan York <york@isoc.org> writes:
> John,
>> Serious debugging _during_ IETF-week really doesn't make sense;
>> but we ought to do it
>
> I agree... BUT... I wonder if we can actually replicate the necessary conditions outside of during an actual IETF week.  It seems to me the loads on the Meetecho servers and network may only be possible during an event week... But there may be other ways to add load.

Perhaps if there was an announced testing/debugging sessions on Fri or
Sat prior we could get a lot of people to join. Friday would be best b/c
people then could be at work (possibly) replicating what their actual
experience would be the following week, but that might be too early
for the IETF on-site end of things.

Thanks,
Chris.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email