IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 07 October 2016 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB57412940F for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e_UBpTf2gWGO for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22DC1293EB for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u97Ka6An003686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:36:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1475872567; bh=Z727pKOBG/sECmpOZaECOSudh6eVd2UtuZZePJ9Nw6I=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QGwk4izud8SciiTxjsfrUrzVTBUGVHVEwfWZRjQWpOodow9VOj4ctS3JsBx/09Hgv XrEoh1GLcYCH9j/S20J6w2zEl4NOEIcV7Qrnn1ZT9jZ/BAqI0fduogM1iYFcdv29CI f1onT/Gwym8lAUe/bF2imLU43ZJ3tt1GzwrCjPcc=
To: "Christian O'Flaherty" <oflaherty@isoc.org>
References: <CAG4d1re1td4oaPpHMHn7Ka4OYT37B6QRsygM1uvWZhDTzqyJGA@mail.gmail.com> <BCD8FF11-6277-466F-B74E-8AF5939758ED@isoc.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <1963b53e-4669-3abe-35b1-068735a636f2@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:35:22 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BCD8FF11-6277-466F-B74E-8AF5939758ED@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/oaSHS2cNcIyrq8wFthtIBpdhiuM>
Cc: "juliao@braga.eti.br" <juliao@braga.eti.br>, "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] what's been working/failed/tried in hubs?
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:35:39 -0000

On 10/7/2016 1:12 PM, Christian O'Flaherty wrote:
> There were hubs that failed because remote participation was impossible (low quality)


 From this, do you have a sense of the minimum connectivity and other 
resource requirements, for successful technical operation of a hub?


d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email