Re: [vmeet] Remote Hubs

Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com> Thu, 10 March 2016 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3F412DCC7 for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:32:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xNTVA34YZw0u for <vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB1A12DCCF for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id z76so88609086iof.3 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:32:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=/6EpZHO3Dw6Yidc2gdljvavKM3KBI3UdMP05JUef8u8=; b=av3IDCKVX4DTxlAmY3nTEzFrtCgo261Sf5LX5TuisPzp8S5tJlEOAQbSCW1cMPViFV YyQiHdjYpjDmjlli59IAZwEBnC7cB9jKoObeyL7rlPW4brps+Zv6FnIz3kmun9KhV/PY n8NyFn0VXsp4GmYq2RKknNuLhlm8yEWEyj9gc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=/6EpZHO3Dw6Yidc2gdljvavKM3KBI3UdMP05JUef8u8=; b=OhAj3SSwFCGDziYWNPGMn23RyP/ChXLqNze6y/agEd6RWxYbQd+b9OcBv8So3nw7Sx 1nu5aSG2LTaO9kopYawLPcp/3MBokv08K4gAKuOGHgKIICHW4NBfZfLrfEnTD3flRDM7 COFcPHhZQHVotCl1Ir5Uuu7yArbRtEkIwXzB4LVHzUGGRujSn2v6iJf9DJcxXhrrIO3n hMgkz0fFbGXdwirAkE6v/DAijPqMOoTUwqmBlahabL9LG00qnSKGX1L1yPm3PyLEHokI 2ggL/4xoFkrYl+pR2KTPstF9qbPOs3uGAXwSMmtvaEd7z11ARzl+Rngc8PvRRhoL/zXY Z+Ig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIIyMRi4YMF4cunxKT1JfRip6mgPkoWbcwFKJrrmJm5rYwppBLuk/JsLtNsps55c7K1acicNB0/hn3LG0vD
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.28.134 with SMTP id c128mr801090ioc.86.1457573559735; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.130.1 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:32:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1022465394.3606828.1457568222041.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <1022465394.3606828.1457568222041.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1022465394.3606828.1457568222041.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:32:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJt_5EigsZGsRtoHGt__cCtk=mvZkKGF38D9JEAmHKspfEttBg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
To: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ff30c43c9cb052da7cac3"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/okOokeCfjhyCCs-4TfSlkXgdA1k>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:01:53 -0800
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>, "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Remote Hubs
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 01:32:43 -0000

There isn't a reason for singling out Asia in: 2.5
6. Scheduling across time zones could be an issue, especially if time zone
of meeting is Asia. Can remote hubs use recordings and watch together to
address time zone differences.

No matter which 3rd of the world the meeting is in, part of the meeting day
overlaps the Midnight to 6 AM hours in one of the other 2.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=3&day=16&year=2016&p1=900&p2=43&p3=136&p4=33&iv=0

Watching a recording instead of being on line real time removes the ability
to interact and give input to the meeting. That works for some goals of
attending (e.g. observing the work or keeping up with what is going on when
one can't attend in person).

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM, <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> We have written a summary of the current thinking on Remote IETF hubs as
> well as what has been done in Latin America.  There is also quite a bit of
> activity in India with remote hubs.
> They will be posting a draft soon.
>
> We wrote these to serve as community memory and to serve as a starting
> point for discussion.  As our knowledge of how to do remote hubs increases,
> we will update the drafts.
>
> Please view:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-elkins-ietf-remote-hubs/
>
> and
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oflaherty-ietf-remote-hubs-lac/
>
>
> Please let us know any comments or suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nalini Elkins
> Inside Products, Inc.
> www.insidethestack.com
> (831) 659-8360
>
>